<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Often Unused Operators: checked and unchecked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formatexception.com/2009/02/often-unused-operators-checked-and-unchecked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formatexception.com/2009/02/often-unused-operators-checked-and-unchecked/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on developing in the Windows World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.formatexception.com/2009/02/often-unused-operators-checked-and-unchecked/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formatexception.com/?p=190#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough VB acts the opposite of C# by automatically throwing overflow exceptions.  I did a bit of googling around and can&#039;t seem to find a VB equivalent for these.  It seems like they only did this for C# since the default behavior is not to throw overflow exceptions and they wanted some way to allow you to do so if you wanted them short of doing a compile with a /Checked+ flag.
You can see more on &lt;a href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.int32.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MSDN&#039;s page for Int32.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough VB acts the opposite of C# by automatically throwing overflow exceptions.  I did a bit of googling around and can&#8217;t seem to find a VB equivalent for these.  It seems like they only did this for C# since the default behavior is not to throw overflow exceptions and they wanted some way to allow you to do so if you wanted them short of doing a compile with a /Checked+ flag.<br />
You can see more on <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.int32.aspx" rel="nofollow">MSDN&#8217;s page for Int32.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.formatexception.com/2009/02/often-unused-operators-checked-and-unchecked/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formatexception.com/?p=190#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to need this in VB.NET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to need this in VB.NET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

